John Polyzogopoulos
Blaney McMurtry LLP
416.593.2953 Email

Ines Ferreira
Blaney McMurtry LLP
416.593.2953 Email

Table of Contents

Short Civil Decisions

BCIMC Construction Fund Corporation v. 33 Yorkville Residences Inc., 2023 ONCA 1

Keywords: Contracts, Interpretation, Construction Law, Liens, Holdbacks, Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Priority, Mortgages, Civil Procedure, Leave to Appeal, Standard of Review, Construction Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30, ss. 14, 22(1), 78, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3, s. 193, G.M. Sernas & Associates Ltd. v. 846539 Ontario Ltd. (1999), 48 C.L.R. (2d) 1 (Ont. S.C.)

Greta Energy Inc. v. Pembina Pipeline Corporation ,2023 ONCA 9

Keywords: Civil Procedure, Leave to Appeal, Costs, Hamilton v. Open Window Bakery Ltd., 2004 SCC 9

SHORT CIVIL DECISIONS

BCIMC Construction Fund Corporation v. 33 Yorkville Residences Inc., 2023 ONCA 1

[Doherty, Zarnett and Sossin JJ.A.]

Counsel:

B.D. Bowles and J.P. Ventrella, for the appellant GFL Infrastructure Group Inc. and agents for A. Pantel, counsel for the appellant Royal Excavating & Grading Limited c.o.b. Michael Bros Excavation

R.J. Kennaley, for the appellant Aqua-Tech Dewatering Company Inc.

G. Hall and A. Steele, for the respondent PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc., in its capacity as court-appointed receiver of 33 Yorkville Residences Inc. and 33 Yorkville Residences Limited Partnership

Keywords: Contracts, Interpretation, Construction Law, Liens, Holdbacks, Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Priority, Mortgages, Civil Procedure, Leave to Appeal, Standard of Review, Construction Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30, ss. 14, 22(1), 78, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3, s. 193, G.M. Sernas & Associates Ltd. v. 846539 Ontario Ltd. (1999), 48 C.L.R. (2d) 1 (Ont. S.C.)

Greta Energy Inc. v. Pembina Pipeline Corporation , 2023 ONCA 9

[Gillese, Huscroft and Sossin JJ.A.]

Counsel:

B. van Niejenhuis and S. Luk, for the appellants Greta Energy Inc. and Great Grand Valley 2 Limited Partnership

M.A. Gelowitz and S. Hay, for the respondent Pembina Pipeline Corporation

R.S.M. Woods and R. Torrance, for the respondent BluEarth Renewables Inc.

J.H. Nasseri and A. Bourassa, for the intervener Ontario Petroleum Institute

Keywords: Civil Procedure, Leave to Appeal, Costs, Hamilton v. Open Window Bakery Ltd., 2004 SCC 9

The information contained in our summaries of the decisions is not intended to provide legal advice and does not necessarily cover every matter raised in a decision. For complete information or for specific advice, please read the decision or contact us.